15 replies to this topic

[Whisky Dude]

POLL: ROMNEY 49, OBAMA 44...

[Tucson Frog]

Whisky Dude, on 08 May 2012 - 09:17 AM, said:

POLL: ROMNEY 49, OBAMA 44...

Whisky, Is no difference something to brag about?

[cdsfrog]

Republican party has made way too many mistakes. I wouldn't be shocked at all to see them lose and they have no one to blame but themselves.

Considering the poll is weighted towards republicans I would consider those results awful.

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Tucson Frog, on 08 May 2012 - 12:02 PM, said:

Whisky, Is no difference something to brag about?

Put some GD money into Intrade on the Romney side then if you believe so much!

[Whisky Dude]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 10 May 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:

Put some GD money into Intrade on the Romney side then if you believe so much!

Somebody put a tac on your chair? Maybe pizz in your wheaties?    Sheeeshe..........Talk about OOZING with hate!

Your post comes off like an angry 12 year old......Like..." OH YEAH!! WELL I DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU!"  LOL

[Tucson Frog]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 10 May 2012 - 05:07 PM, said:

Put some GD money into Intrade on the Romney side then if you believe so much!

If I believe what so much?

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Tucson Frog, on 11 May 2012 - 05:33 PM, said:

If I believe what so much?

That it's 50-50. I cannot make any money until it gets at least 55-45 for Obama instead of 60-40.  50-50 would be much better.

[STL Frog]

Where can I put money on the likelihood of NFF posting every David Frum article that contains the words "GOP" and "extreme" from now until November?

[NewfoundlandFrog]

STL Frog, on 11 May 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

Where can I put money on the likelihood of NFF posting every David Frum article that contains the words "GOP" and "extreme" from now until November?

See if you can start a market on Intrade. It's your right.

I suspect you'd lose, however. "Every" is a pretty hard goal. Doubt I could reach it and therefore you'd lose.

Black and white lose out again.

[STL Frog]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 11 May 2012 - 06:54 PM, said:

See if you can start a market on Intrade. It's your right.

I suspect you'd lose, however. "Every" is a pretty hard goal. Doubt I could reach it and therefore you'd lose.

Black and white lose out again.

I wouldn't lose 'cause I have not - nor would I ever - venture into what might as well be the "gambling for Dungeons & Dragsons fans" world.  

Btw, want black and white? You've never posted a Frum article that hasn't been critical of the GOP.  Want another?  You whine constantly about Fox News bias yet haven't mustered a single complaint about the far more biased MSNBC.  Black and white enough for you?

Thanks for playing.  Next.

[NewfoundlandFrog]

STL Frog, on 11 May 2012 - 07:07 PM, said:

I wouldn't lose 'cause I have not - nor would I ever - venture into what might as well be the "gambling for Dungeons & Dragsons fans" world.  

Btw, want black and white? You've never posted a Frum article that hasn't been critical of the GOP.  Want another?  You whine constantly about Fox News bias yet haven't mustered a single complaint about the far more biased MSNBC.  Black and white enough for you?

Thanks for playing.  Next.

I hope you're keeping your BP checked. Your face seemed tinged in red a lot tonight. Apoplexy is a serious problem if indulged in excessively.

Of course you'd lose. You made an absolutist statement that already is wrong if Frum has posted anything in the last few minutes. In the real world absolutist statements are almost always wrong as there really are pretty much zero absolutes int he empirical world.

I don't watch MSNBC. Can't say I could name a single anchor. Very little I can say about it.  My kids watch Fox a lot simply to laugh at it. Their problem is they don't really believe anyone actually believes it's real. They deep down think it's comedy. I try to explain but generally fail.

That said,  I don't really originate posts about Fox all that much either that I've noticed. Not far off the number of posts I originate about MSNBC I'd think.

[STL Frog]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 11 May 2012 - 07:34 PM, said:

I hope you're keeping your BP checked. Your face seemed tinged in red a lot tonight. Apoplexy is a serious problem if indulged in excessively.

Wait, you haven't been able to tell that I get incredibly bored watching your twist yourself into logical contortions?  My bad.  I'll try to convey it more effectively.  

Are there "I'm really, really bored with this guy who claims to be a moderate" emoticons?  Let me know, I'll post lots of them from here on out so you don't keep getting confused.

Quote

Of course you'd lose. You made an absolutist statement that already is wrong if Frum has posted anything in the last few minutes. In the real world absolutist statements are almost always wrong as there really are pretty much zero absolutes int he empirical world.

The guy's seriously trying to get technical with a joke I made.  Hilarious.

Uh, prof, let me repeat:  You've never posted a Frum article that wasn't critical of Republicans.

Quote

I don't watch MSNBC. Can't say I could name a single anchor. Very little I can say about it. My kids watch Fox a lot simply to laugh at it. Their problem is they don't really believe anyone actually believes it's real. They deep down think it's comedy. I try to explain but generally fail.

But then I don't really originate posts about Fox all that much either that I've noticed.

Oh boy.  This spin is so bad it's good.  Keep on keepin' on "Mr. I never watch MSNBC but never miss an opportunity to complain about Fox News" moderate!

Keep us posted on the trials and tribulations of convincing your children that all those people watching the channel that gets better ratings than CNN and MSNBC combined are really, really stupid.  

"No really kids.  All those people who watch Fox News really are that dumb!  You gotta believe me!"

[STL Frog]

NM

[gohornedfrogs]

STL Frog, on 11 May 2012 - 07:07 PM, said:

I wouldn't lose 'cause I have not - nor would I ever - venture into what might as well be the "gambling for Dungeons & Dragsons fans" world.  

Do those guys bet on quidditch, too?

[NewfoundlandFrog]

STL Frog, on 11 May 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:

Wait, you haven't been able to tell that I get incredibly bored watching your twist yourself into logical contortions?  My bad.  I'll try to convey it more effectively.  

Are there "I'm really, really bored with this guy who claims to be a moderate" emoticons?  Let me know, I'll post lots of them from here on out so you don't keep getting confused.

The guy's seriously trying to get technical with a joke I made.  Hilarious.

Uh, prof, let me repeat:  You've never posted a Frum article that wasn't critical of Republicans.

Oh boy.  This spin is so bad it's good.  Keep on keepin' on "Mr. I never watch MSNBC but never miss an opportunity to complain about Fox News" moderate!

Keep us posted on the trials and tribulations of convincing your children that all those people watching the channel that gets better ratings than CNN and MSNBC combined are really, really stupid.  

"No really kids.  All those people who watch Fox News really are that dumb!  You gotta believe me!"

Jeez...now you cannot even quote yourself correctly!!! That's really bad!

Original Quote: "Where can I put money on the likelihood of NFF posting every David Frum article that contains the words "GOP" and "extreme" from now until November?"

New Quote: Uh, prof, let me repeat:  You've never posted a Frum article that wasn't critical of Republicans.

I'd call that a rather inaccurate repetition, but then maybe it's the thought that counts.

If you think I'm lying about MSNBC and Fox, there's not much to say. I'm not.  If you have proof of something different, say so. You don't, of course. You just like name calling and false accusations by nature, I guess. I prefer having a different nature.

[gohornedfrogs]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 13 May 2012 - 02:30 PM, said:

Jeez...now you cannot even quote yourself correctly!!! That's really bad!

Original Quote: "Where can I put money on the likelihood of NFF posting every David Frum article that contains the words "GOP" and "extreme" from now until November?"

New Quote: Uh, prof, let me repeat:  You've never posted a Frum article that wasn't critical of Republicans.

I'd call that a rather inaccurate repetition, but then maybe it's the thought that counts.

If you think I'm lying about MSNBC and Fox, there's not much to say. I'm not.  If you have proof of something different, say so. You don't, of course. You just like name calling and false accusations by nature, I guess. I prefer having a different nature.

It seems to me that the guy who proclaims to never see things in black and white would be able to see the gray area in STLs quote...