A&M, it turns out, did the Big 12 a favor by leaving.
Yet Baylor ferociously opposed it and trotted out the lawyers to try and stop it.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 12:57 AM
A&M, it turns out, did the Big 12 a favor by leaving.

These Frogs have horns!
Posted 03 May 2012 - 02:12 AM
Meh. It's a really long way from LA to Seattle.The PAC 12 divisions are geographically cohesive and the ACC could have compact divisions but they chose not to. I suspect that when the ACC goes to 14, assuming the Big 12 doesn't raid them, they will go to a more north south split than the currently have. The problem with what will be the east division of the big 12 is that one division will be pretty much perfect and the other will cover half the country.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 02:21 AM
You have a point on the private schools issue, but not on the probation issue. It has certainly never seriously dented interest in the SEC, which has dealt with far more probation issues over a much longer period than the SWC ever did.
The biggest drawback of the SWC was undoubtedly its overly compact geography. The only game in that conference that ever truly drew national attention was Texas-OU. Even the annual UT-A&M game was a big "meh" outside of Texas and possibly Oklahoma. And even Oklahoma interest was mostly limited to its effect on conference standings and how it might impact OU or Okie State. The match-up itself drew only mild attention in Oklahoma.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:35 AM
Meh. It's a really long way from LA to Seattle.
But the options west of the Mississippi, excluding the state of Texas, are much more limited than on the east coast where major national-brand schools pop up every 100 miles.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:39 AM
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:44 AM
You guys are just setting yourselves up for dissapointment. This is not happening.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:04 AM
You guys are just setting yourselves up for dissapointment. This is not happening.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:17 AM
You guys are just setting yourselves up for dissapointment. This is not happening.
Re: Swoopes and UT
They are going to offer JT Barrett before Swoopes!
Re: Jordan Moore to announce live Tues
Auburn. Sorry guys.

Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:23 AM
Words to live by......an ongoing concern......
Vulgarity is like art - everybody thinks they know what it is, yet nobody can agree on what it is.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it...no matter how off-base it is.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:06 AM
Posted 03 May 2012 - 11:48 AM
All the way or not at all!Screw ND. No interest in them without football.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:24 PM
Screw ND. No interest in them without football.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:40 PM
$40 million in exit feesOkay, I'll bite...
What is the 800-pound gorilla in the room in regards to FSU and Clemson?
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:43 PM
$40 million in exit fees
Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:19 PM
$40 million in exit fees
Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:32 PM
The ACC schools would regain most of that money in year 1 if my math is right.
Example, FSU likely to make $15M in ACC for all three tiers (after ACC receives bump for Pitt & Cuse additions). In B12 FSU makes $20M in tiers 1 & 2, and another $10M selling tier 3 (based on Texas $15M & Kansas $8M tier 3 numbers) for a $30M total. So after 1 season in the B12 FSU is only down $5M. After 2 seasons they are up $10M. Over the life of a 10 year contract FSU is up $130M. And this is assuming no tier 1&2 bump for adding a FSU or Clemson.
The ridiculous potential money difference is the only reason I give this rumor any credence.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:57 PM
Actually, if CU and FSU join, it will be $30M per with the escalator clause and CCG. It's $20.91M as a 10 team league.
KillerFrogs Gear
DirectoryWe were tired of searching for quality TCU products, so we decided to create place where fans like us could get these products, so The Varsity Š Fort Worth was born.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users