Jump to content




Planned Parenthood


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 Whisky Dude

Whisky Dude

    Kenneth Davis

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9,420 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2012 - 04:54 PM

The 1984 you is the weak link they can push and squeeze. Just like Walmart does it to their people.


Either your not understanding me, or im not understanding you. The point I was trying to make is that in 1984 I think I was living fairly well for a young kid working a menial job.

Like I say, after bills and living expenses .......I could have saved 25% of each paycheck had I wanted to. How many working families could do that today? Save a quarter of their takehome? Not many.....to say the least.


Other thing is.....Wage increases never really keep pace with real inflation. It just gradually happens over time , until suddenly,... you find yourself running like a rat on a wheel never able to snag that illusive piece of cheese.....:biggrin:
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

Thomas Jefferson





#22 NewfoundlandFrog

NewfoundlandFrog

    Davey O'Brien

  • Tier 1
  • 32,796 posts

Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:13 PM

Either your not understanding me, or im not understanding you. The point I was trying to make is that in 1984 I think I was living fairly well for a young kid working a menial job.

Like I say, after bills and living expenses .......I could have saved 25% of each paycheck had I wanted to. How many working families could do that today? Save a quarter of their takehome? Not many.....to say the least.


Other thing is.....Wage increases never really keep pace with real inflation. It just gradually happens over time , until suddenly,... you find yourself running like a rat on a wheel never able to snag that illusive piece of cheese.....:biggrin:


Actually wage increases at the top very definitely have kept pace with inflation. Beaten it rather dramatically, actually.
Posted Image

#23 Whisky Dude

Whisky Dude

    Kenneth Davis

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9,420 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2012 - 05:16 PM

Actually wage increases at the top very definitely have kept pace with inflation. Beaten it rather dramatically, actually.


Maybe so, like I say ,...inflation has its most crippling effect on the middle class and working poor.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

Thomas Jefferson

#24 pcf

pcf

    Dutch Meyer

  • Full Member
  • 26,592 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:07 PM

Either your not understanding me, or im not understanding you. The point I was trying to make is that in 1984 I think I was living fairly well for a young kid working a menial job.

Like I say, after bills and living expenses .......I could have saved 25% of each paycheck had I wanted to. How many working families could do that today? Save a quarter of their takehome? Not many.....to say the least.


Other thing is.....Wage increases never really keep pace with real inflation. It just gradually happens over time , until suddenly,... you find yourself running like a rat on a wheel never able to snag that illusive piece of cheese.....:biggrin:


$7.50 in 1984 is the equivalent of $16.00 now.

$79 is about $172 now. $20 is about $43 now.

Prices would seem equivalent, but not the wage for menial work.

The hardest thing would be to find a small 2 bedroom house. That's considered an anachronism and hard to sell.

Inflation really isn't our economic problem. Deflation could kill us.

#25 burford

burford

    Kyle Clifton

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,283 posts

Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:29 AM

Inflation really isn't our economic problem. Deflation could kill us.

Tell that to the Weimar Republic.

#26 NewfoundlandFrog

NewfoundlandFrog

    Davey O'Brien

  • Tier 1
  • 32,796 posts

Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:33 AM

Tell that to the Weimar Republic.


I think that's what he meant by it not "our" problem! :biggrin:

It definitely was "their" problem. Quite true! Or at least I think so until George Will says different!
Posted Image

#27 fnfreebird

fnfreebird

    Dick O'Neal

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 7,759 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas
  • Interests:Science, Education, Scuba Sports, Boating, fishing, planning.

Posted 21 February 2012 - 07:44 AM

What you've been told isn't the whole story:

Planned Parenthood all about women's health? Hardly

And guess what? Now the majority of mothers under 30 are unwed:

Single moms now a majority

Good work, libs...


The real design from their 'man' behind the curtain?
Isn't it actually likely that then entire industry was designed as little more than a:
"rituals from innocent blood required in payment for occult knowledge gained from communications with evil supernatural intelligences."
- Just sayin....
Because the deeper one studies all this the uglier it gets.
Just a microcosm of the fantasy of the left and the ends they'll go to to make it seem real!" "The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance." — Albert
And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words. (Dan. 7 v.8)

#28 burford

burford

    Kyle Clifton

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,283 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:28 AM

And nearly all of those poor kids are destined to life of poverty and broken homes. Statistics prove it time and time again. Yet, try criticizing it and see how quickly you are branded an evil hateful conservative. Millions upon millions of children with hardly a future at all due to the left's ideology and WE are the ones who don't care for the poor. Give me a flying break.

#29 George F. Will

George F. Will

    Ki Aldrich

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:51 AM

$7.50 in 1984 is the equivalent of $16.00 now.

$79 is about $172 now. $20 is about $43 now.

Prices would seem equivalent, but not the wage for menial work.

The hardest thing would be to find a small 2 bedroom house. That's considered an anachronism and hard to sell.

Inflation really isn't our economic problem. Deflation could kill us.


The current economy is the result of inflation. However, deflation in the housing market has hidden the CPI index hikes. Look at each component and the price change. Then look at food & energy which are not included in core CPI. Inflation hurts the poor the most becuase they are least able to hedge against a devaluing currency.
Low Taxes | Minimal Regulation | Stable Currency

#30 George F. Will

George F. Will

    Ki Aldrich

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:01 AM

Below is an interesting chart showing the difference between two towns. It is from Charles Murray's book Comming Apart.


Posted Image

The Fishtown folk at the top of the graph have never attended college. The Belmont people at the bottom have at least a bachelor’s degree. On average, the Fishtown folk are poor. The Belmont folk are much richer.


Low Taxes | Minimal Regulation | Stable Currency

#31 George F. Will

George F. Will

    Ki Aldrich

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:04 AM

Heres is another chart that looks at the proportion of children who have done better than their parents.
Low Taxes | Minimal Regulation | Stable Currency

#32 IronSkillet

IronSkillet

    Jeff Ballard

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,012 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Panther City

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:40 AM

Interesting charts George. I have little more than a layman's understanding of economics in general, but socioeconomic studies like this one really fascinate me.

BTW, I think fnfreebird just insinuated that planned parenthood is being directly orchestrated by Satan. Still surprises me somehow.
Posted Image

#33 pcf

pcf

    Dutch Meyer

  • Full Member
  • 26,592 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:46 AM

The current economy is the result of inflation. However, deflation in the housing market has hidden the CPI index hikes. Look at each component and the price change. Then look at food & energy which are not included in core CPI. Inflation hurts the poor the most becuase they are least able to hedge against a devaluing currency.



We've not had inflation in labor costs. Sure, we've had rising prices in some areas, but we've also had deflation in others.

The working poor have seen both nominal and real wage losses, with fewer good paying jobs to move up to.

#34 burford

burford

    Kyle Clifton

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,283 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:03 AM

Interesting charts George. I have little more than a layman's understanding of economics in general, but socioeconomic studies like this one really fascinate me.

BTW, I think fnfreebird just insinuated that planned parenthood is being directly orchestrated by Satan. Still surprises me somehow.

What I take from all this is that the bottom quintile of blacks is $36,000 a fricking year.....and that is poor and I should be required to give up another $10-20K a year for that? Let me think.....hell, no.

#35 burford

burford

    Kyle Clifton

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,283 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:04 AM

The working poor have seen both nominal and real wage losses, with fewer good paying jobs to move up to.

...and why should they when the government will pay them unemployment for 2 years and the total in government assistance is more than what they could make working for a living? What would you do?

#36 Spike

Spike

    Kyle Clifton

  • Full Member
  • 8,794 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:12 AM

...and why should they when the government will pay them unemployment for 2 years and the total in government assistance is more than what they could make working for a living? What would you do?


wwpcfd?
Remember the 5!

#37 burford

burford

    Kyle Clifton

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,283 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:20 AM

wwpcfd?

:tongue: Good one. Awww, pc would probably look around and try to find somebody with some cash and insurance and find a way to sue them and get a settlement. Pretty SOP in the legal profession.

But how do, Spike? Haven't seen much posting from you here lately.

#38 George F. Will

George F. Will

    Ki Aldrich

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:39 AM

We've not had inflation in labor costs. Sure, we've had rising prices in some areas, but we've also had deflation in others.

The working poor have seen both nominal and real wage losses, with fewer good paying jobs to move up to.


True, in every recession we have experienced real wage losses and reduced federal revenues. Right now the supply of workers exceeds demand, which as you know places downward pressure on wages.

Unfortnately, the CPI is the best measure we have (which is poor, I know) but it measures the costs of consumer goods, not labor costs.
Low Taxes | Minimal Regulation | Stable Currency

#39 George F. Will

George F. Will

    Ki Aldrich

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,652 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, Illinois

Posted 21 February 2012 - 11:41 AM

...and why should they when the government will pay them unemployment for 2 years and the total in government assistance is more than what they could make working for a living? What would you do?


Just had a friend that decided that it was time to look for a job again because her unemployment was running out...
Low Taxes | Minimal Regulation | Stable Currency

#40 The Uniballer

The Uniballer

    Darrell Lester

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,958 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 February 2012 - 12:12 PM

Seems like a good old fashioned Works Program would make everyone happy.


KillerFrogs Gear

Directory

Yogi's Bagel Cafe

Voted Best Breakfast in Fort Worth, TX



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users