253 replies to this topic

[Frog79]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 15 February 2012 - 12:41 PM, said:

Correction: FF does not demand respect. She has earned respect. She very rarely corrects anyone in the behavioral sense even in some instances where I think she should. But when she has I can't say I've ever seen her correct someone wrongly. She even corrected me once about an important issue, and guess what? She was dead on, 100% correct.

An adult listens to deserved correction. A less-than-mature person takes the routes of denial and pushback.

Just sayin'.

You lecturing me, or anyone else, about respect and denial is beyond absurd.  Wow.

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 02:12 PM, said:

You lecturing me, or anyone else, about respect and denial is beyond absurd.  Wow.

Sic stat.

Not to be disrespectful, or anything, but anyone with a smidgeon of reading comprehension will note that I didn't "lecture you about respect and denial." I lectured you on FF's moderation history and on how adults act.

Just another part and parcel of how poorly you reason in any manner w.r.t. what's correct.

[Frog79]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 15 February 2012 - 02:46 PM, said:

Sic stat.

Not to be disrespectful, or anything, but anyone with a smidgeon of reading comprehension will note that I didn't "lecture you about respect and denial." I lectured you on FF's moderation history and on how adults act.

Your fundamental assumption  is wrong, as usual, in this case. FF may have earned your dubious respect but among the fair-minded folks I am in contact with here she is pretty universally not respected at all, unfortunately.  So nice try but next time try to get your core assumptions correct so as not to attempt another wrong-headed, condescending lecture that just makes you look foolish.

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:

Your fundamental assumption  is wrong, as usual, in this case. FF may have earned your dubious respect but among the fair-minded folks I am in contact with here she is pretty universally not respected at all, unfortunately.  So nice try but next time try to get your core assumptions correct so as not to attempt another wrong-headed, condescending lecture that just makes you look foolish.

Are you over 20?

BTW: Weren't you the paranoiac who was accusing people of PM'ing about you without a trace if evidence? Trust me: no one is.

OTOH maybe __'s 3rd  PM (post # 23 on the PM thread) about you was pretty funny. Who would have guessed that about you?

[Frog79]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 15 February 2012 - 03:53 PM, said:

Are you over 20?

BTW: Weren't you the paranoiac who was accusing people of PM'ing about you without a trace if evidence? Trust me: no one is.

OTOH maybe __'s 3rd  PM (post # 23 on the PM thread) about you was pretty funny. Who would have guessed that about you?

What 'PM thread' are you talking about?  I don't read many threads here other than the global warming threads.  My main entertainment is watching you and Duqie make fools out of yourselves by posting things you can't back up and then getting called out on it by me and having no answer.   Then there are your delusions about such things as medicine not being science, etc.  Quite fun to watch you hang yourself with stupid comments, statistical incompetence, ignorance of the greenhouse gas signatures, etc. You are just a fountain of misinformation and incompetence, at least in the scientific realm - but boy is it fun to watch.  ;)

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 05:40 PM, said:

What 'PM thread' are you talking about?  I don't read many threads here other than the global warming threads.  My main entertainment is watching you and Duqie make fools out of yourselves by posting things you can't back up and then getting called out on it by me and having no answer.   Then there are your delusions about such things as medicine not being science, etc.  Quite fun to watch you hang yourself with stupid comments, statistical incompetence, ignorance of the greenhouse gas signatures, etc. You are just a fountain of misinformation and incompetence, at least in the scientific realm - but boy is it fun to watch.  ;)

Are you 19?

[Frog79]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 15 February 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:

Are you 19?

Still can't refute facts, eh?  Are you 12?  On drugs?  BTW, what were you high on when you tried to compute confidence intervals on autocorrelated data and then inexplicably annointed yourself an expert on statistics?  Must have been some good [Craig James].  

I gather from prior posts, when you were trying to rehabilitate your image after I exposed your statistical incompetence for all here to see, that you  are  a teacher of some sort.  I sincerely hope for your students' sake that you do not teach statistics or science.  If so then God help them.

[NewfoundlandFrog]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 08:10 PM, said:

Can't refute facts, eh?  Are you 12?  On drugs?

Are you 18?

[Frog79]

NewfoundlandFrog, on 15 February 2012 - 08:15 PM, said:

Are you 18?

Proving once again that you are quite the numbers maven, lol.

[RSF]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:

Your fundamental assumption  is wrong, as usual, in this case. FF may have earned your dubious respect but among the fair-minded folks I am in contact with here she is pretty universally not respected at all, unfortunately.  So nice try but next time try to get your core assumptions correct so as not to attempt another wrong-headed, condescending lecture that just makes you look foolish.

IOW, Burf, fnfree, whiskey....


Definition of 'fair-minded' being we all think alike because we share the same brain......

[Whisky Dude]

RSF, on 16 February 2012 - 09:58 AM, said:

IOW, Burf, fnfree, whiskey....


Definition of 'fair-minded' being we all think alike because we share the same brain......

Said the sad little parrot.  

[purpledawg]

Frog79, on 15 February 2012 - 03:44 PM, said:

FF may have earned your dubious respect but among the fair-minded folks I am in contact with here she is pretty universally not respected at all, unfortunately.

She's earned my "dubious" respect, too. BTW, can you please name these "fair-minded folks" who are so disrespectful of the lady?
You seem like a very angry person. Is that true?

[Frog79]

RSF, on 16 February 2012 - 09:58 AM, said:

Definition of 'fair-minded' being we all think alike because we share the same brain......

LOL, sounds like a certain group of intolerant, mind-numbed liberals here.  (I'll leave it for you to decide if you are part of the elitist, brain-sharing club).

[Frog79]

Whisky Dude, on 16 February 2012 - 10:07 AM, said:

Said the sad little parrot.  

Rather ironic, isn't it?   The psychologists call it 'projection'.  Liberals are obviously very good at projection. ;)