Posted 13 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
Duquesne Frog, on 13 February 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
I assume that you arrived at the number '52' in much the same way you arrived at the upper and lower limits earlier. The 2007 report ALONE had 620 authors
. That's not to mention the 4 other massive reports and various other supplemental reports
. The number of people who contributed to the IPCC reports is north of 2000.
Once again you [Craig James]/ume wrong and show your stupidity. There were 52 authors of the Policy Summary, which is the part of the report that gets passed around to the press and politicians and is passed off as a 'consensus'. There other contributors but they don't write the report and often disagree with the final version. Some have quit the IPCC in protest. Anyway, as I show above, one of the authors admits throwing a little propaganda here and there while trying to pass it off as valid scientific research. But you have no problem with that? Nah, I thought not.
“Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”
-Alarmist researcher, Phil Jones, when asked to provide data to verify his apparently fraudulent global warming claims. Think these guys might have something to hide?