Separated Players
#1
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:15 AM
#2
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:29 AM
#3
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:33 AM
Plenty of guys in the NFL with longer rap-sheets than these guys.
#4
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:40 AM
#5
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:00 AM
Big Frog II, on 27 February 2012 - 08:40 AM, said:
Well, if the school and the media hadn't decided to splatter their names and pictures all over the country, they'd at least have a chance to come back if it turned out that they were not guilty. Instead, the Police and School thought it'd be a good idea to declare them guilty in the court of public opinion and end any chance that they would've had at finishing their careers at TCU.
#6
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:07 AM
HFrog1999, on 27 February 2012 - 09:00 AM, said:
I agree wholeheartedly. With a little hindsight, I would think some of the key players in the media firestorm think the same way.
#7
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:16 AM
I am more concerned with having the right people/players represent TCU, than a technicality representing the school.
#8
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:31 AM
#9
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:31 AM
Endless Purple, on 27 February 2012 - 09:16 AM, said:
I am more concerned with having the right people/players represent TCU, than a technicality representing the school.
And, while I doubt these players were innocent, on the slim chance that they are, the police and school already screwed up their chances of playing again with the big media firestorm. The cop already got one suspect wrong, what if he missidentified Brock? I'm not saying he did, I'm just saying that they shouldn't have convicted him during the press conference.
#10
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:39 AM
HFrog1999, on 27 February 2012 - 09:31 AM, said:
I think if there was a press release stating an error was made and he is the victim of mistaken identity, he would be quickly redeemed, plus get more press coverage for himself as well once the season started. I think people would be quick to welcome him back to the ranks of the innocent - people have short memories now-a-days.
#11
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:53 AM
What a revolting development this is.
GIT 'EM FROGGIES!

#12
Posted 27 February 2012 - 11:24 AM
Opintel, on 27 February 2012 - 10:53 AM, said:
What a revolting development this is.
#13
Posted 27 February 2012 - 11:46 AM
Big Frog II, on 27 February 2012 - 08:40 AM, said:
That's just the defense attorneys doing their job. They will latch on to whatever they can to create reasonable doubt.
#14
Posted 27 February 2012 - 04:51 PM
#15
Posted 27 February 2012 - 04:53 PM
Army Frog Fan, on 27 February 2012 - 04:51 PM, said:
#16
Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:09 PM
HFrog1999, on 27 February 2012 - 04:53 PM, said:
GIT 'EM FROGGIES!

#17
Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:18 PM
#18
Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:36 PM
#19
Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:28 PM
PurplePainD, on 27 February 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:
I doubt it. The police were never interested in getting these guys to flip on "their suppliers". I'd be surprised if any of them were ever formally interviewed while in custody.
#20
Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:02 PM
Kaiser, on 27 February 2012 - 06:28 PM, said:
GIT 'EM FROGGIES!

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users





KillerFrogs Gear









